<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DataPortability is boring?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/dataportability-is-boring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/dataportability-is-boring/</link>
	<description>Personal Blog - Chris Saad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amy</title>
		<link>http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/dataportability-is-boring/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-793</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you&#039;re arguing his points perse. I think you&#039;re arguing with how he phrased them. The arguments (both sides) are valid however and I agree with you on point 2 and 3. Point 1, however, I think I lean more towards his (other than the term Web 2.0) but in general his statement seems true (at least to me - big tech person who signs up for everything and just stops using some; and my friends - only uses mainstream online services).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re arguing his points perse. I think you&#8217;re arguing with how he phrased them. The arguments (both sides) are valid however and I agree with you on point 2 and 3. Point 1, however, I think I lean more towards his (other than the term Web 2.0) but in general his statement seems true (at least to me &#8211; big tech person who signs up for everything and just stops using some; and my friends &#8211; only uses mainstream online services).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/dataportability-is-boring/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Viva La Resistance!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viva La Resistance!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DataPortability Still Doesn&#8217;t Exist, Did Michael Arrington Lie? : The Drama 2.0 Show</title>
		<link>http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/dataportability-is-boring/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>DataPortability Still Doesn&#8217;t Exist, Did Michael Arrington Lie? : The Drama 2.0 Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-790</guid>
		<description>[...] noticing that DataPortability&#8217;s Chris Saad had responded to a post I wrote more than 6 months ago on the subject of &#8220;data portability&#8221; (hey, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticing that DataPortability&#8217;s Chris Saad had responded to a post I wrote more than 6 months ago on the subject of &#8220;data portability&#8221; (hey, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
